TurboTax Deluxe Federal State EFile 2008 Old Version DOWNLOAD

Posted In: Best Mortgage Deals

Dulcie Manganiello says...

TurboTax Deluxe Federal + State + eFile 2008 [DOWNLOAD] I thought this was a little misleading as it says Federal and State but when I went to download the state it said it would cost another $39 and some change. I don't remember paying to download my state other years

Posted on November 4, 2010

Gwenda Leed says...

to answer the question, the difference appears to be Enron got caught.Every year Turbotax gets a little sneakier in their marketing efforts.The last two years, I noticed I could buy Turbotax cheaper through Amazon.com and at Office Deport than from their emailed "promotional" price, so I did.This year, it is the same (about a 20% savings).You would think if you come back each year, they would give you a discount.Or, if you already have a downlaoded copy installed, they would provide an update to convert you to the next year forms which would provide an incentive to being a loyal customer.But no, these slimeballs charge you more each year.Well, no more for me.The E-file feature does me no good, as my return has to be physically mailed due to the number and type of forms used.It is not hard to set up an Excel program to do your calculations which I've done any way in order to crosscheck the Turbotax numbers.I also understand TaxCut can upload prior Turbotax returns so I may go that route.Basically, after using Turbotax for nine years, I'm tired of being ripped off and treated like a gullible idiot.

Posted on November 6, 2010

Nohemi Sandridge says...

Nowhere in Turbo Tax's promotional material do they you say anything about their new pay-as-you-go pricing structure, which comes on top of their new software price increases.



Every new return you print/file after the first one will cost you an ADDITIONAL $9.95! But they don't tell you that until AFTER you've download and installed the software.



If you don't like these bait-and-switch tactics, buy TaxCut or TaxAct, which allow unlimited individual returns for no additional charge. TaxCut also allows you to transfer data from Turbo Tax 2007 returns.

Posted on November 9, 2010

Aida Gowers says...

From Amazon's tax software front page: "Save more when you download your TurboTax 2008 software directly to your computer with Amazon's Software Downloads Service."Um, Amazon is charging $55.49 for the download, and $52.99 to mail me the CD-ROM?Not only does this directly contradict Amazon's sales pitch, it makes no sense at all for the download which does not cost virtually anything to deliver to cost more...



As for Intuit, they seem to try to pull some backdoor pricing shenanigan like this every year.What a sleazy company!

Posted on November 9, 2010

Janeen Sugerak says...

What a chore! I followed the directions and installed the downloader application.I purchased the download but couldn't get the downloader to start downloading the software.I set Internet Explorer to trust amazon.com but that didn't work.I use Internet Security 2009 so I set up the firewall to allow the downloader application to freely access the internet.That allowed me to start the download but it finished with an error.I tried rebooting my PC and tried downloading again with the same result. Finally the third try it completed successfully.Who knows why.The progress bar on the downloader screen was no where close to being correct, so just ignore it.You may want to be a computer wiz to use the download option.



After I installed the tax software I started it up and clicked the big button to download the state software and it told me I would be charged almost $40 for the state software when it was supposed to be free.I advanced the tax program to the point where the state return begins and it allowed me to download one free start from there.



So what did I get for two days of my spare time?I bought the software download for $38.99 but found the shipped version of the same software on Amazon.com for $34.95 + 4.99 shipping so I saved about $1.00.Live and learn...

Posted on November 12, 2010

Melaine Dresch says...

I can't even download the software. When I first tried downloading it, it went beyond 100% and never finished downloading. I used Amazon's "Call Me" feature and I received an automated message saying that they were only available during certain hours and I had to call back. I tried this at 11am and 1pm pacific time. Then I tried calling the regular Amazon support number and I spoke to two people who literaly did not understand English enough to look up my order. This has been a very frustrating experience. I will never buy digital software from Amazon again. It is now four days after my purchase and I still can't even download it.

Posted on November 12, 2010

Wes Deister says...

[3/12/09 UPDATE: FOR ANYONE WHO DEDUCTS MORTGAGE INTEREST AND IS WONDERING WHETHER AND HOW THEY OWE AMT, PLEASE READ THE COMMENTS ATTACHED TO THIS REVIEW FOR CURRENT STATUS AND INFORMATION REGARDING INTUIT'S HANDLING OF THIS MAJOR SOFTWARE ERROR THAT CAUSES FORM 6251 NOT TO BE GENERATED/FILED AND POSSIBLE UNDERREPORTING OF TAXES OWED.]



* * *



I am an attorney and my wife is a tax attorney, and we have spent hours reverse engineering and confirming TurboTax software problems (with dummy numbers) last night to determine ONCE AGAIN that the brain trust at TurboTax is giving us defective product.I have used TurboTax since 2005 (only for the spread sheet aspects), and, now that the IRS has made free online filing spreadsheet software available regardless of income (check out the new "Fillable Forms" at the IRS Free File website), THIS WILL OFFICIALLY BE THE LAST YEAR I USE TURBOTAX.Hooraahhh!Every year I find numerous errors in their software (from mortgage interest deduction, to carry-overs, to properly completing non-cash charitable donations per IRS requirements, to calculating AMT credits, and now to yet another problem described here), and like many of you guys, every year that I write in about a problem, I get one of their generic, inane replies from some low-level non-attorney who knows nothing about the tax code.Like years past, I spend more time beta-testing their software bugs than actually doing my tax return.This year, I easily computed and input all my data for our 2008 return, but I can not get TurboTax to generate (unless I start overriding everything . . . which can lead to other problems) this year's requisite Form 6251 for the AMT so that I can actually e-file my return.Unlike most people, we do our returns manually per the paper IRS forms, instructions, publications, and tax regs (again my wife is a tax lawyer), and then we input it all in TurboTax to e-file it . . . and like this year, I ALWAYS find major problems in their software.For example, thousands of Americans are claiming a mortgage interest deduction on Schedule A that they are not entitled to due to the way TurboTax incorrectly distinguishes between home equity indebtedness and home acquisition indebtedness in the context of, e.g., refinanced primary mortgages that include a cash-out component, as well as due to the lack of direction in their menus about the need to compute average mortgage balances.TurboTax's interview just generically refers you to the IRS publication(s), which everyone tells me they do not have time to do (they tell me that's why they bought the software to begin with, so that they do NOT have to look at the Pubs, Regs, or Code) . . . even my attorney friends who use Turbo don't refer to the tax Pubs to figure out their average mortgage balances, and say instead that they simply claim everything on their 1098 Mortgage Interest Statements (which is wrong!).TurboTax could easily fix this longstanding gap in their software by hiring a tax attorney and programmer to add the same sort of interview questions and worksheets that are in Publication 936.But for some reason, after years of making this complaint, they still fail to do this.Seperate and aside from this problem, now I see this year, another huge software bug (described below) that makes me wonder how many filers with mortgage interest are not including Form 6251 for the AMT (even if they do not owe AMT, the form must still be attached/e-filed in many cases).As I say to all my friends, if you don't learn the basics of the tax code and check your taxes manually at least somewhat, then you will be in trouble if you solely rely on any version of TurboTax . . . as I have found that TurboTax has done my taxes wrong every year (2005, 2006, 2007, and now 2008).[This is absolutely true.Every year, my wife and I have had to override and/or spend days complaining to Intuit about necessary patches, etc.]Of course, I hope everyone here realizes that all these people that say "TurboTax is Easy and Great" in their 5-star reviews are often the worst type of resources to rely on for an assessment of whether this software is worth your money (and more importantly, time). . . as, how can these cheerleaders possibly be in a position to critique whether the software works correctly if they don't understand what is supposed to happen tax-wise in a given situation?If you read through ALL the reviews, you will often see the most critical reviews coming from people who evidence some tax knowledge on what TurboTax is supposed to do . . . these people seem far more reliable to me.Many of these 5-star reviews can be completely discounted by the fact that they were written by people who never had a CPA or lawyer verify that their alleged "so easy, so simple, so wonderful" tax returns were actually done correctly by the software's interview.As I said above, now that there is no income requirement for completing your return online at the IRS website with their free tax spreadsheet Fillable Forms (brand new option this year!), I will be saying GOODBYE to wasting $30-$60 a year on this software that my wife and I have to beta-test for days.And you can too.Trust me, as an attorney, your best options for your taxes are: (1) learn the tax code just enough so that you know what should happen tax-wise during each set of interview questions (and if you do that, then you can now use the IRS "fillable forms" and e-file for free at the IRS website); or (2) pay a little more and use a CPA or attorney.As your instinct probably tells you, no software program alone is going to magically do this stuff correctly for you; even worse is that it does it wrong after so much wasted time in so many cases.The wasting of so much of one's time to beta-test this product is just outrageous.[And waiting to buy the software is just no good, as, in year's past, I was still receiving patches right up to the filing deadline in April!] Completely unfair that this product continues to dominate the market when the IRS/Treasury should simply do-away with all the lobbying Intuit does here in Washington DC each year, and instead should expand its "fillable forms" with a set of free basic interview questions like Virginia and other states make available online.



As far as the specifics of the problem on the Form 6251 not being done correctly, if you are interested, here is my detailed post about this debacle on a thread on TurboTax's Live Community.[YOU SHOULD ALSO READ THE COMMENTS ATTACHED TO THIS REVIEW FOR MY TAKE AS OF 3/12/09 ON HOW EGREGIOUS THIS ERROR HAS BEEN, AS WELL AS COMMENTARY AND OPINION ON INTUIT'S HANDLING OF IT TO DATE.]



Live Community post follows:



FORM 6251 not being generated!

MAJOR ERROR IN TURBOTAX DELUXE 2008!!



My wife and I are attorneys (she is a tax attorney), and once again your software is saying I do not need to submit a Form 6251 when in fact I am REQUIRED by the Form 6251 Instructions to attach a Form 6251 to my return (even though I do not owe AMT this year, the form must still be generated and attached).



I am required to attach the Form 6251 because, per the Instructions: "The total of Form 6251, lines 9 through 28, is negative and line 32 would be greater than line 35 if you did not take into account lines 9 through 28." In my case, all of our home mortgage interest is deductible under the regular tax this year, because all of our home equity debt (which happens to be used for investment) is less than 100K; thus, we do not need to complete the TurboTax questions (under the regular tax) for Investment Interest Expense (i.e., because we already are claiming all of this interest as home mortgage interest, we can not and do not need to take it again as investment interest expense simply because the proceeds happen to be used for investment). Thus, TurboTax correctly does not generate a Form 4952 for the regular tax.



However, under the AMT regime, I need to enter values on lines 4 and 9 of Form 6251 to add the interest on the home equity debt back into my AMT income and then subtract it out of my AMT income as investment interest expense. I realize this is essentially a wash, but it does not exclude me from the requirement of filing the Form 6251. WHY IS TURBOTAX FAILING TO GENERATE AND E-FILE A FORM 6251 IN THIS CASE? Also, TurboTax should be generating a Form 4952-AMT (for my reference only of course), but IT IS NOT GENERATING ONE EITHER.



Clearly, TurboTax's inquiry can't handle a situation where you are not claiming investment interest expense in the regular tax world (because it all qualifies as home equity debt), but then you need to claim it in the AMT tax world. PLEASE FIX THIS ASAP.



TURBOTAX NEEDS TO GENERATE BOTH THE FORM 6251 AND FORM 4952-AMT IN SITUATIONS LIKE MINE.



Follow-up Message from me to TurboTax programmers:



You guys screwed up! Why do I have to beta-test your software every year!?!?!?



I just sent you a detailed problem about Form 6251 not being generated. It turns out that at the beginning of the AMT questionnaire, there is an error in your Form 6251 worksheet programming. In response to the AMT question "Tell Us About Your Mortgage Interest," if I input a lower value for "Interest Paid on an Eligible Mortgage" (as compared to the home mortgage interest value from my regular tax Schedule A), then your software does not enter any "home mortgage interest adjustment" in the worksheet (and on line 4 of a Form 6251). Thus, no Form 6251 is being generated when in fact it is REQUIRED per the instructions to the Form 6251.



Also, in prior years, there was always a question in TurboTax that would then ask you to adjust for any investment interest expense you might be able to claim under the AMT if any of this above ineligible interest happened to be used for investment (and therefore could be subtracted out on Line 9 of Form 6251).



Shame on you TurboTax. I can't even correctly file my return this year until you fix this. I wonder how many people have already filed their taxes without Form 6251, even though they were required to do so (regardless of whether they owe AMT, the Form 6251 must still be attached in these cases).

Posted on November 13, 2010

Janetta Pacius says...

This is our tenth (and last) year of using TT-Deluxe.



We initially chose it because it was simple to keep track of year-to-year depreciations on our rentals as well as easily handle stock-option transactions. It once even found a little known (now gone) tax credit for state sales tax (we have no state income tax).That was neat!So, we kept buying TT-Deluxe.



This year, I saw all of the negative reviews at Amazon (funny, over 300 a month ago, now only 53?) but bought it anyway.My wife did the taxes today, and was totally PO'd when I got home that I bought the wrong version.It seems that she went all the way through the return and realized it didn't ask questions about our rental property.She went back through it and couldn't find it anywhere.She ended up calling INTUIT, who told her she had to upgrade to the PREMIER version.She ended up paying nearly $40 for the upgrade to the package that cost less than that originally.



I still have the box from TT-D 2007.It is NEARLY IDENTICAL to the box for TT-D 2008.The same options and features in the "Which TT is right for you?".I even saw a post in the Amazon forums from INTUIT spin-doctor BOB MEIGHAN saying that whichever version you used for 07 would be fine for 08.I would say that BM owes me $40 and an apology for my wife.



He pulled a similar stunt with Quicken 2009.He sent out a letter saying that everyone with Q2006 must upgrade to continue using all features.But even then it turns out that if you buy the SAME version you have been using for years (we have used Quicken since before Windows 3.0) you are going to pay AGAIN for the "upgrade" version that you really need.



Don't jack with your loyal customers, Bob.In this tough economy, you should be giving us loyalty discounts, not slimy sales tricks.But you are stimulating the economy in your own way.You are strengthening your competition by sending new customers their way.



Sometimes, change is a good thing.Bye-bye INTUIT!

Posted on November 15, 2010

Joey Lacourse says...

The Turbo Tax people have changed their minds.You don't have to pay $10 per return any more and you get 5 free federal e-files.They heard the complaints and changed their pricing policy.

Posted on November 15, 2010

Jenise Gaulzetti says...

Since the majority of the existing comments cannot seem to convey this information without foaming at the mouth about getting ripped off. Here it is in simple English.



You purchase TurboTax Deluxe Federal + State + eFile 2008 for whatever dollar amount above. I paid $47.45 on 3/1/2009.



You get to create your federal and state tax returns.



You can efile your federal return for free.

(I did not attempt more than 1 federal efile, so I cannot speak to additional fees for additional efilings).



You can efile your state return for an additional $19.95.



That is it.



I chose to efile my federal return for free, and print my state and mail it.



I had no problems downloading it with the amazon downloader, it took all of 5 minutes.

Posted on November 18, 2010