Second In Command 2006

Posted In: Building Insurance

Amelia Bankey says...

Second in Command isn't that bad of a movie, in my opinion, largely because there are enough gunfights, explosions, and general mayhem to overshadow some of the weaknesses in the story.With a couple of exceptions (largely moments of less than heartfelt Marine bravado), the acting is acceptable.Van Damme is Van Damme, of course; he's fine as long as he's shouting orders or killing people, but the romantic relationship between his character and a female reporter doesn't have enough spark to light a cigarette.And while I'm on the subject, why oh why can't we have at least one military-related movie without the main character getting sidetracked all the time with a love interest?In this particular case, the little love subplot does more harm than good - it's pretty hard for me to respect a military attach

Posted on March 23, 2011

Thea Hupf says...

I am in my twenties now and am more into drama films and trendy artistic films from foreign countries (chalk that up to my wife's influence on me), but I still have a guilty predeliction for unapologetically mindless action movies where things blow up, bad guys do bad things for no apparent reason, and (of course) a heroic character defeats countless enemies using martial arts and other cool fighting techniques, while those same countless numbers of villains fail to kill him despite firing millions of rounds of machine gun ammunition at him.



I used to love Van Damme movies when I was aged 8-14, back when he was making better films, although I've always considered him a subpar actor (the same is also true, in my opinion, for Arnold Swarzennegger). I thought his martial arts scenes in movies like Bloodsport and Kickboxer were worth the rental price (or, in those days, asking my mom or dad to rent them for me).



Then came 1995's Timecop, and I absolutely loved that movie (as a child -- now it seems kind of tame and not as good as I remembered it). I thought VanDaame was finally becoming a better actor and fast on his way to being a megastar.



Unfortunately, VanDamme's career has faded since then, after a string of box-office and critical failures, and he has become more of a B-grade star and direct-to-video actor a-la Michael Dudinkoff (American Ninja). It's good to see that he's still working, but it seems like his work is really sucking right now. One exception might be 2000's Legionnaire, a VanDamme movie that is surprisingly good, though certainly no Hard Target -- a movie from his glory days.



For me, I think one of the biggest reasons why Van Damme is on a downward spiral as far as his movies go (aside from his lousy acting) is because he's lost credibility as a martial arts virtuoso. I chalk this up to the time he allegedly got beat up at a nightclub. In the version I heard, Van Damme was purportedly behaving in an obnoxious manner in the club, and security naturally confronted him and asked him to moderate his behavior, or leave. Van Damme then allegedly began mouthing off at the security guard (a beefy skinhead-looking guy) and performing various martial arts moves apparently designed to intimidate the other guy. The other guy, I guess, wasn't impressed because he then decked Van Damme with one right cross and Van Damme left the club on a stretcher.



Sigh.



How the mighty have fallen.



Oh, by the way, Second in Command sucks.

Posted on March 24, 2011

Lindsay Botton says...

From a Van Damme fan, this was a big disappointment. The camera work and directing is terrible. The camera could not stay still for more than 3 seconds and I started to get a headache after the first 12 minutes. What was with everything being filmed in close up. I thought I had a full screen copy but I checked and it said widescreen. I find it hard to believe by the way this movie looks that they spent 22 million on it. What did they spend the money on, the fake CGI helicopters and a truck load of home movie digital camcorders!! Dolph Lundgrens The Defender is similar to this, made for 5 million and is a much better attempt at this type of movie and looks more than its budget. Second In Command does come of as a very cheap looking TV movie of the week with bad actors and cheaply dressed sets. Every actor in this was completely wooden including Van Damme who is taking himself way to seriously these days and the, I want to act and be taken seriously is starting to get tired. Show some personality or at least smile once in a while!! The fight scenes with Van Damme are short lasting about 15 seconds, are badly staged and filmed and consist of nothing more than a few kicks and a punch. The showdown with the main villian at the end is filmed in slow motion to drag it out a bit but is so dull you would rather speed it up just to get the movie over with. The action set pieces are terribly executed, filmed and lack any imagination. The movie is incredibly boring and I don't know why Van Damme thought this would be a fun, enjoyable action movie that the fans want to see because it's not. For me I'd have to put Second In Command between Derailed and Universal Soldier 2 in Van Dammes worst movies list with Derailed being the worst movie he has made since his career took of with the excellent Bloodsport. I'm very thankful I rented this instead of buying it outright DVD unseen expecting it to be as good as In Hell or Wake Of Death. A big step back for Van Damme. Based on this, I am no longer looking forward to Til Death as it is another Simon Fellows directed, "I want to be an actor" Van Damme vechicle. Definitely rent before considering a purchase.

Posted on March 24, 2011

Tyrone Valree says...

I agree with the problems related to all the technical issues cited by other reviewers, but found the movie problematic at its core. First, military personnel are not EVER in the chain of diplomatic authority in a United States Embassy. So the entire premise of this movie is an impossibility because the character JCVD portrays would never be "Second in Command." Sure, there is a willing suspension of disbelief when watching a movie, but there is just SO MUCH WRONG in this movie, that verisimilitude is impossible. A Navy Commander (O-5) outranks a Marine captain (O-3) and would ALWAYS have command precedent in a military situation, whether a message was sent to higher authority or not. Marines simply do not dress nor act like those depicted in this film. The uniforms were wrong. The "Gunny" had a soul patch and chin whiskers! NEVER! And the Marine captain tells a Marine to "seal this room, soldier." ARRGGGH! No Marine, under any circumstances, would refer to another as a "soldier." How about the Marine Expeditionary Unit helicopters, hovering over the Embassy, announcing, "This is the U. S. Army..."? Oh, and what Marine Embassy Security Unit, defending their post from attack during the hours of darkness, would have the building bathed in light?

Posted on March 24, 2011

Missy Steinhauer says...

I went to several stores here in Charlotte, NC to search for the DVD and found very few copies were available (they were hidden on the shelf--not even in the "new release" section) and were retailing at $22. I thought that was a bit rediculous for a direct-to-dvd Van Damme flick, but being a fan I spent the money anyways.



Overall, I found the movie very boring and completely forgettable. I think it finally hit me that Van Damme will never make another movie that I will thoroughly enjoy (the last being Maximum Risk - 10 years ago).



The Plot - D



Don't worry about spoilers as this plot has been used so many times before there is nothing to spoil. Hero gets dispatched to a war zone, hero must gain respect of peers, hero must have a love interest to break up the action segments, hero must be betrayed or have something bad happen, and then the hero saves the day. If you are familar with the original Assault on Precinct 13, then picture that movie but in a military, foreign country setting. Also, it doesn't help that the movie is very short--standard 90 minutes or less.



Character Development/Acting - C



Van Damme was playing, well Van Damme (actually Commander Keenan). His acting has not changed in over a decade. (His acting improved back in 1995's Timecop from his earlier movies, but has never gotten any better since Timecop.) He is stiff, hard to understand and never really all that believable as a Navy SEAL. For those of us who loved his old movies and the martial arts--forget it. He has maybe 3-4 one-on-one fights where he does a few kicks, but mostly uses punches, a knife, a gun and a assault rifle to dispatch the enemies. They try to give his character a back story about why he won't evacuate the embassy, but it is so vague and short, that it really doesn't matter.



As for the supporting actors, there were no standouts. They all played their roles and I have never seen any of them in anything before. At least in Wake of Death, you had a young Asian actress who, in my opinion, did a great job in her role alongside Van Damme. In this movie, every supporting actor was utterly forgettable. The forced romance between the female newsreporter and Van Damme's Keenan was out of place in this kind of movie and there was no chemistry between the two.



Music Score/Sound - D



Was there one?Seriously, I cannot remember even one melody or action score. As for sound, well, it was the typical machine guns, loud explosions, etc.



Cinematography/Visual Effects - C



This category would have actually gotten a B, except that certain scenes have some very noticeably bad CGI and model effects. The actual cinematography was good with some hand camera work that made you feel that you were watching the events unravel on CNN. Likewise, the scale of the movie seemed a lot larger due to the camera angles and the existing architecture. (One scene has a bunch of people trying to assault the embassy and it was very convincing.)



Movie Overall - C



DVD Features - F



This release is perhaps the best example of a poorly made DVD. It only contains the movie and a bunch of trailers of other direct-to-dvd movies. But get this--there is no trailer of the actual movie, teaser or otherwise!!



Likewise, there are no special features or commentaries.



And this is from Sony Home Entertainment!!They spent no money on this package and then have it retail over $20.



I only hope, as a Van Damme fan, that The Hard Corps will remove the sour taste in my mouth that I have after watching Second in Command, a truly bargain basement thriller that should retail at $5. Rent this movie, before buying!!

Posted on March 25, 2011

Sherill Bozzell says...

The Jean Claude Van Damme Review Matrix (JCVD-RM)



1.Who is he? Sam Keenan, a military man appointed second in command to an ambassador in a vague Eastern European country named Moldavia

2.Which family member/friend must be avenged?His friend, the U.S. ambassador

3.Does he take his shirt off? Within the first five minutes of the movie.

4.Does he have sex with a C-List actress? The official policy is "don't ask; don't tell", but JCVD has a little fun before the jet engine that got him in country has cooled down.

5.Is there a tournament?No tournament (Considering Bloodsport, I'm really sad that more of his movies aren't tournament oriented)

6.Is training needed for this tournament?Pretty much every JCVD movie revolves around martial arts training or military training.This movie is no different.

7.Does he do the splits in training or in the tournament?No splits, no tournament

8.Does he punch someone in the balls?Grab, squeeze, twist, kick, knee...all in a row...all to the same guy.Ouch.

9.Does he do a series of flying or 360 kicks?Saved like presents on Christmas, JCVD unleashes on the final unfortunate villain.

10.Is his enemy unbeatable? Armed insurgents are a worthy adversary, but never unbeatable; they're too rag-tag and insufficiently supplied.

11.Does he overcome an injury or other hindrance? He has to constantly battle strategy and defense with a smarmy CIA agent born without a spine or balls.

12.Does he win?JCVD wins, but it's mainly due to the assist from the Apache helicopters



Shot partially in a hand-held home video - presumably to add a more realistic feel - the actual scenes are tough to digest.Each scene is so poorly done that it gives off the feel that there simply wasn't a budget sufficient enough to film the entire move with the "big cameras".JCVD would have benefited from a viewing of Samuel L. Jackson's Rules of Engagement for an appropriate reaction to an embassy attack.The only other downfall to this movie is it was clearly the inspiration for The Hard Corps, which may as well have been called "Third in Command". Not the best JCVD action, but it's a worthwhile shoot'em up flick that should keep an action fans' attention.

Posted on March 30, 2011

Shawnee Greviston says...

I've been a huge fan of Vam Damme since I saw him in No Retreat, No Surrender then even more after I had seen Lionheart. The problem is after Universal Soldier: The Return his movies have lost alot of the intensity, and dare I say it integrity that the previous ones had and that I've always enjoyed. I mean I give him credit for The Order, Derailed, and Desert Heat, those were pretty good but nothing like what he used to make. I do realize that he is trying new things, maybe even trying to get away from just doing Martial Arts flicks but if I were him I'd stick to what I'd know would do well.



To tell you the truth this one was so bad I couldn't even bear to finish watching it.



What happened to you big guy?

Posted on March 30, 2011

Lorena Sweaney says...

We all know (especially van damme fans) these movies are bought for one purpose: the fight scenes.Not only does this movie have horrible fights, they are too far in between and hardly involve any classic van damme hand to hand combat.The first fight, actually, the first scuffle i should say was like 2 punches and the guy went down.The last fight suffered from some of the worst editing and slow motion i have ever seen in a movie.I actually got dizzy watching it.Please dont waste money on this like I did.Save it for Kumite which should be what us van damme vans have been waiting for,

Posted on April 1, 2011

Matha Aanerud says...

I just don't understand all the low ratings this movie has received. Sure there are some definite issues with the military jargon and I imagine a military advisor would have certainly helped the credibility but come on! When I watch a Van Damme movie, I don't exactly expect to see Platoon. This sure won't win any academy awards but the action was very decent with a lot of tension and firefights. The hostage rescue scene and the knife fight were awesome, sure the situation is improbable but what action movie isn't? Everything here is excellent for a direct to DVD video and this is a great way to spend an afternoon and if you find it for a couple dollars like me, I suggest you give it a go.

Posted on April 5, 2011

Hyon Mcglynn says...

Among the numerous numbers of the direct-to-video films, Jean-Claude Van Damme's `Second in Commander' is far better than other average or below-average action films including those starring Steven Seagal and Wesley Snipes. The film's plot is just a retread of the familiar situation like `Assault on Precinct 13' or `Alamo,' but it keeps us entertained from the beginning to the end.



Jean-Claude Van Damme is a newly arrived US commander Sam Keenan in some politically unstable Eastern Europe country where the insurgents try to capture the president of the country. The people are led by renegade leader Anton Tavarov (Velibor Topic), and they surround the U.S. Embassy where Keenan, the president and other Americans barricade themselves in the building. The rest of the film is about the chess game to survive, and the whole process is surprisingly well-done.



Except the opening chapter where the film attempts to establish the `documentary' tone with shaky camera and grainy image, the setting of `Second in Command' is limited to the embassy where outnumbered marines try to fight back the swarming militia with firearms. There is a suggested romance between Jean-Claude Van Damme's character and a US journalist played by Julie Cox, but the sub-plot does not detract us from the tension of the film.



Though Jean-Claude Van Damme does not show his martial arts skills as he used to (except the last sequence), the film's actions are effectively done, and though the range of his acting is still very limited, Van Damme's acting as washed-out commander is not bad. Unfortunately, the special effects used to express the explosions fail to convince us, lacking the money they should have. And most curious thing is, though the embassy is surrounded by the insurgents, their attack is always from one side of the block (namely the front gate), which is quite inexplicable.



But in spite of its lower budget, `Second in Commander' is a good action film. Perhaps you must have seen everything in this film done elsewhere, but that does not change the fact the film has enough power to hold our attention throughout.

Posted on April 8, 2011